Much of the gay christian movement’s gay-is-right dogma isn’t connected to the scriptures as much as they’d like you to think. Rather, its built and housed on a secular conceived concept of so-called immutable sexual orientation. The gcm’s unchangeable law of sexual orientation is a sacred tenet among those who promote false doctrines in the church. Its a golden cow they worship with all its attendant idolatrous fervor.
In fact, without this sacred tenet, the gcm’s entire argument that homosexuality isnt sinful would vanish into thin air. But why would a self named Christian organization build its very foundation on a lie created by the political gay movement? The answer may reveal where their true loyalties lie.
The fundamental problem with the golden cow of sexual orientation is that its in direct contradiction to what the scriptures clearly state. God created one man and one woman, then sexually, emotionally and relationally oriented the one man to the one woman and with divine finality, pronounced it good. Thus there is only one orientation sanctioned and created, biblically that is. Any and all others are only shadows of man’s deep plunge into sin and his unquenched desire to justify his sin before a holy God whose original intent remains unaltered.
A little history
Sexual orientation is a loaded phrase grafted into societal lexicon after homosexuals and their supporters rejected the original reference “sexual preference”. Remember how everyone –even them– used to swear by it? Well, according to the Sexuality Information and Education Council (SIECUS), a prohomosexual sex organization, the rejection came because “sexual orientation is no longer commonly believed to be one’s conscious individual preference or choice, but instead thought to be formed by a complicated network of sociological, biological,economic and political factors.” So according to these self appointed experts, sexual orientation can be caused by “economics and even politics? The gay movement is at its core a political movement with political goals and needed cursory, soundbite language to support its goals. Literally, the gay movement woke up one morning and decided their feelings were part and parcel of some massive conspiracy beyond their control. Of course, this shift in thinking served the misguided, money hungry mental health professionals who knew a gay ca$h cow when they saw it.
FACT: The gay christian movement is a mirror image of the gay political movement only it claims a Christian veneer.
There are more glaring errors with the humanist thought which birthed the golden cow of sexual orientation. Social reconstructionists do not recognize homosexuality as sinful. Consequently, this allows them the unfettered ability to attach a plethora of victimist causologies (the economy, religious bigotry, political discrimination, etc) as reasons for their predicament. But if one’s sexual orientation is inherent, how is sexual orientation formed by a complex network of factors? Surely no child is impacted to the extent that in the womb “politics” would cause them to be homosexual upon birth.
To further confuse the intent of the golden cow, gay (christian ones too) activists contend that homosexal orientation and homosexual behavior are two different things, thus they are given a self exemption from having to alter something which is (in their reasoning) unalterable. And while there are differences in what should be more accurately termed homosexual thoughts and behavior, both are still equally birthed from the same fallen expression of sexuality rather than from God’s creative intention. This is what they refuse to acknowledge for obvious reasons.
The other reason why the golden moo-moo of sexual orientation, like homophobia is an critical tenet of the gay movement is because of the immutability factor. Black folk this is one reason why the homosexual movement craves your approval. In other words, if sexual orientation is proven to be unchangeable, Christian ministries (like mine) will be on the fast track to being declared illegal.
What is severely problematic with the alleged immutability of the sexual orientation argument is the issue of “transgenders”. Transgenders (transvestites, transsexuals, et al) were at first grudgingly relegated a place in gay rights table i.e “glbt”. The “t” is for transgender. But an outcry from the confused men and women eventually brought them into the sexual confusion mosaic. Transgenders presented an organizational and public policy problem for gay rights activists because their core arguments were polar opposites!
Transgenders – We are not born in the right gender/orientation, therefore it must be changed.
Gays – We are born with this orientation and therefore it cannot be changed.
The irony is that it is impossibe to change one’s gender, while it is quite possible to change one’s sexual preference and thoughts.
How can two vastly different ideologies claim that the same God gave them this privelege? I’ll leave that up to you to debate, but it is a mystery. What isnt a mystery is that the gay christian movement has set up a golden cow in the church and like the antichrist in Rev. 13:14-15 is demanding that we all fall down and worship it.
I’m sure there is a fiery furnace being constructed somewhere for those who refuse to dance to their perverted gospel music and worship their egotistical abomination.
Care to join me there?