Aliens, movies and same sex foolishness

Okay, let’s make fun of stupid alien movies. Hurry, we’ve got to do this now because they’re are coming to destroy us all! Why? Well glad you asked. They have discovered Im blogging and blogging has been banned on earth. The reason? Well, we’re exposing aliens in movies who try to act like God but in an ironic way end up proving that God really has no equal when it comes to managing the human race. But I digress.

aliens2So much for my stupid movie plot. But hey in Hollywood anything is possible (click the thumbnail).

I was talking to my friend James on yesterday about a movie he went to see. Its called “Knowing” and stars Nicolas Cage [full synopsis].  James told me Knowing was an off-centered attempt to circumvent and perhaps in some instance, obfuscate biblical truth about the end times. Hollywood is good at that. The fantasy world they create in the movies is one they desperately wish would be true.

As the synopsis goes, the “celestial angel-like beings” (read:aliens) have grand intentions to destroy this world and start another. Its a hint of sodom and gomorrah ripoff, with God being replaced by the aliens. Again, H-wood fantasies tend to run wild sometimes. Knowing ends with Caleb and Abby, two children and the only people “saved” from the destruction being dropped off by the aliens on a new planet and running towards what appears to be the “tree of life”.

But here’s where the questions started for me. Its clear (at least in the movie) that the celestial angelic-like aliens are much more intellectually and technologically advanced than humans. They’re also morally superior to humans. So why did the aliens choose a male and a female to start new human life? Why didn’t they choose a same sex couple to represent the so-called “sexual diversity” of humanity? Let this current “progressive” culture tell it, same sex coupling is equal, if not in some respects, better than the male-female model.  But the sweet irony is that even aliens know when it comes down to what really matters (the regeneration of human life) the bible is right.

The whole notion that homosexuality was created by God is so ludicrous not even movie aliens would touch it.

If you saw the movie remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still, you saw the same thing.  This one is also about morally, technically and intellectually superior aliens coming to earth to set stupid humans straight or else destroy them. But what else is new?

In this plot, the main message the aliens want mankind to get is that if we don’t stop killing one another, then they will kill all of us. It reminds me of the GLSEN “day of silence” foolishness. Their main message is that everyone should stop calling gay people out of theeartsstillir names. But, then founder Kevin Jennings calls those who oppose GLSEN out of their names. Such is the nature of hypocrisy.

Again, the movie rips off Biblical imagery. At one point in the movie as the aliens are calmly going about their plans to annihilate human life, somehow a brilliant idea is hatched to save animal life. And  guess what? They take a male and a female of each species into sphere shaped vehicles referred to by one character as “arks”.

So with all the claims of inherent homosexuality in animal world being normal, why didn’t the aliens take two male zebras and two female peguins?

“One fundamental premise in social debates has been that homosexuality is unnatural. This premise is wrong. Homosexuality is both common and highly essential in the lives of a number of species,” explains Petter Boeckman, who is the academic advisor for Norway’s “Against Nature’s Order?” exhibition.

Sorry, I’m with the aliens on this one. Homosexuality is a one-way, dead end direction. It has no propensity to give life and nothing about it reflects the image of God. But God has already told us that. Too bad the stupid humans who keep demanding “equality” can’t see that.

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created man in his own image,  in the image of God he created him;   male and female he created them Genesis 1:26-27 NIV

I am going to bring floodwaters on the earth to destroy all life under the heavens, every creature that has the breath of life in it. Everything on earth will perish. 18 But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the ark—you and your sons and your wife and your sons’ wives with you. 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. Genesis 7:17-19

18 thoughts on “Aliens, movies and same sex foolishness

  1. Homosexuality is both common and highly essential in the lives of a number of species,”,/i>

    You just made my day – that made be burst out laughing! 🙂

  2. Hey thanks for the laugh 🙂 so you think this would be a good plot? I cant wait till opening day!

    Who can we get to play the aliens?

  3. Homosexuality is both common and highly essential in the lives of a number of species

    The pro-homosexual and atheist groups really tip their hands with lines like that. They assume there is no God and conclude that Darwinian evolution must be true. Then they point to anything that exists as evidence of evolution because they insist evolution is true. It had to have evolved that way because they consider no other options.

    When you point out that homosexual behavior and abortion would be wrong in their question-begging assumption that it is a moral good to perpetuate the species, they come up with quotes like that above. It is as if there were no abortions or homosexual behavior that the scientists and sociologists would be scratching their heads and saying, “This makes no sense! Given what we see with animals we’d expect to see abortions and homosexual behavior in humans. Where are they?!”

    GCMW: So true Neil. Thats really at the core of the rejection of biblical truth along with the supportive biology and science. They dont want to acknowledge God. But its kinda hard to get around him no matter how clever these types try to be.

  4. Pro-gay doesn’t mean anti-straight. You are implying that people that are pro-gay think that everyone should be in same sex relationships. That’s silly. Everyone agrees that heterosexuality is OK and necessary. It’s even fine that the vast majority of people are heterosexual. But if there are some who are attracted to the same sex, and they want to partner with someone of the same sex, then that’s OK too, and it doesn’t threaten the propagation of the species, or anything else for that matter.

    It’s also silly and arrogant for human beings to declare that they speak with the authority of the Creator of the Universe. Especially when using The Bible, a human creation, to do so.

  5. Riiight.

    You can use the Bible as the authority because the Creator of the Universe said it was the authority.

    Willful ignorance is sad.

    GCMW: Gee, why so sour? Have aliens let you down in the past?

  6. I think you may have missed the point. In fact I’m sure you did. Why would the aliens choose a man and a woman, you ask? Well, if my biology classes taught me anything, it’s that, you know, you need a male and a female to reproduce. It has nothing to do with ethics or morals or being anti-gay. In fact, you answered your own question in saying this:

    “So why did the aliens choose a male and a female to start new human life? ”

    Because it would be physically impossible for a male-male or female-female pairing to reproduce. Is that somehow difficult to figure out?

  7. I MADE the point, how could I miss it? LOL

    The point is that whether moral or not, homosexuality serves no good purpose in terms of what matters most. For good measure we supported that point with biblical truth.

    Even aliens have that much sense. Pity that humans cant see what God has so clearly shown.

  8. Scott, My post wasnt about numbers nor was it implied that numbers factor in the creative non-usefulness of homosexual conduct. That’s your red herring. Whether two people or two million, homosexuality is opposite the Creator’s intent for humanity.
    Even the aliens saw that.

  9. LOL. Sour? Why would I be? It’s a fulfillment of prophecy. I’m just saying that hearing deniers misconstrue the Bible is getting a bit tiresome. You would think that by having so much time on their hands, they would come up with better tall tales….

  10. I think you may have missed the point. In fact I’m sure you did

    Oh man, two out loud bursts of laughter in one day!

    Hi Mr. Stephen King – I think your movie missed the point, in fact I am sure it did – LOL!

  11. How so? I will admit that I’m a bit too blunt for my own good. What do you think I meant?

    GCMW: It isnt bluntness, imo its the opposite. I dont see you being clear about what your are affirming or criticizing. Particularly, who are the “deniers” which “misconstrue the Bible”?

  12. Okay, so you’re positing that the underlying message to this movie somehow links to homosexuality being immoral, or at least, useless? Because if you are, I think that’s a huge, huge stretch.

    GCMW: No, that’s not what Im positing. I just explained what Im posting. Trying reading without a predetermined mindset.

    The goal of the aliens was to start humanity anew, yes? So the only way they could do that was by finding a male and a female character, since, well again, biology et cetera. That’s not so much a statement that “gays are useless” so much as it is a public service announcement regarding sexual education, ie, “it takes a male and a female to reproduce.”

    GCMW: You said “gays are useless”. I said homosexuality is a one-way dead end experiement. Please note the not so subtle differences.

    Obviously the aliens wouldn’t choose gay people, since it would be physically impossible for them to have kids.

    GCMW: Right. Hence, the Bible is right in that it upholds the male-female marriage model (as well as its inherent ability to procreate) as the only sexual/emotional/relational expression which reflects the image of God. So by deduction, all other formats of sexual expression are illegitimate.

    I think you’re grasping at something that simply isn’t there.

    GCMW: Or perhaps youre not seeing what has always been there.

  13. Ah. I see your point. Well, to be clear….my point is that people generally make statements about the Bible without actually reading or studying it. In fact, a lot of false doctrine out there is is built on “Well-a-lot-of-people-believe-it-so-it-Must-be-true” logic. (or so it is called.)

    By “Misconstrue the Bible”, I meant that people tried to force the Bible to say what THEY want it to say and don’t allow it to Bible (God) to speak for itself.

  14. Ha! ha! ;yes, even the people in hollywood know the real deal and I’m sure there were homosexuals who worked on these movies too! LOL this is really funny. When it comes down to the wire, God’s way is the ONLY WAY! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. I think that humans get what God has son clearly shown…it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out….it’s common sense that it takes male-female to reproduce life. I’m sure it’s not a shock to straight, gay, asexual, black or brown people…and anybody that knows anything about human anatomy for that matter…so your point is well taken. It takes a man and a woman to produce another life. FACT. We got it! thanks for the Advanced Biology class review. (2 thumbs up)

    You quoted the scripture about God making male and female only originally “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them”

    You quoted that scripture to show us that anything created outside of what God originally made is sin…or wrong…or out of bounds..right?

    GCMW: Wrong. It was to show the Creator’s original intent.

    If you apply that thought to that one scripture, then…other things that exist that God didn’t originally create or anything that doesn’t serve the purpose for which God created originally must be sin. So, let’s point out some other sinful things that exist..shall we?

    Since we’re talking about ‘species’ on this post….let’s start with other types of species that exist that God didn’t originally create.

    Let’s start with the dog. there are hundreds of types of dogs..but none of these species existed when Noah put them on the ark. He only put at most 2 types of dog species in the ark. Shall we rid of all of the other sinful species of dogs that live in our houses? afterall, God didn’t originally create them. STUPID muts!!

    The original race of Adam and Eve were middle eastern/ jewish….but that doesn’t mean that every other race is sinful or God didn’t have a good purpose for all the other races. oh wait! That’s how slavery started huh?

    And what about our eyes that were originally created so that we could see? Are those who are born without sight in sin? I think the disciples asked this same question in John Chapter 9….”who sinned?? this man’s mother or father that he’s born blind???” I mean..afterall, God originally created 2 eyes so that we could see..

    I could go on and on about legs having the original purpose of walking, but that are being used in karate and being used to learn various forms of dance….or hands that are used for sign language to communicate with others…OUTSIDE of its original purpose or intent….

    GCMW: Since you were wrong about the reason I cited the scripture, you’ll need to go back to the drawing board to refute it. Sorry. Hope you have better luck next time.

    Since we’re using God’s original creation as the standard and everything else as sin….

    but i think even religious folk have that much sense to know that your basis is in error…

  16. GCMWatch,

    So, are you saying that you didn’t mean to point out that same-sex relationships (homosexuality) is a sin because it’s outside of the Creator’s original intent???

    Or were you just trying to show us the Creator’s original intent only and nothing else?

    because if you were pointing out God’s original intent and defining things outside of that as sin….then my response is accurate.

    but if you were only trying to show us his original intent only….then you could’ve did that without aliens….

    Humans understand better than you think they do..

Comments are closed.